



Quick answer: posts published on Mondays around midday (11am to 2pm, Adelaide time) got the most engagement for accounts posting through Magic Marketer®, measured against each account's usual. Treat it as a starting point. Use your own post history: the hours your better posts went out, inside your network's working day.

Updated October 2026 · 5 min
LinkedIn is the least generous platform with audience timing data: post analytics show how each post did, and creator analytics show follower growth and impressions, but there is no "when your followers are online" chart the way Instagram and Facebook offer. So the history of your own posts is the chart. Which ones did well, and when did they go out. (You can do this in a spreadsheet. Nobody does this in a spreadsheet twice.)
LinkedIn is a work platform, so what practitioners generally see is that engagement sits inside the working day and drops off at night and on weekends. That is convention, not documented behaviour, and it holds better for LinkedIn than for any other platform because the audience is there for work. The complication is time zones: a consultant in Adelaide whose clients are in Sydney and Singapore has two working days to choose from, and a chart built from New York helps with neither.
LinkedIn posts also have a long tail. A post that catches keeps getting shown for days, so the hour decides the first push and the post decides the rest. A customer with 150 connections got 28 leads from one post. The size of the network and the hour were not the story. The post was.
Posts published on Mondays around midday (11am to 2pm, Adelaide time) got the most engagement for accounts posting through Magic Marketer®, measured against each account's usual.
It is a starting point, not your answer. Your own followers beat everyone else's average, ours included. Data pulled 12 October 2026 and refreshed every month.
From your own account's history on that platform: when your followers have engaged with your posts before. It needs enough posts to see a pattern, so on a brand-new account it uses a sensible default until your numbers arrive, then switches. It is per platform, because your LinkedIn audience and your Instagram audience are not the same people on the same clock.
On the review screen you can publish now, pick a time, or choose "schedule for best performance". Most people choose the third and stop thinking about it, which is the point.
The customers who ask us about LinkedIn timing are almost always the ones who post once a fortnight. Once the posts are ready before Monday and go out five times a week, the hour becomes a setting rather than a decision. That is the difference between a LinkedIn presence and a LinkedIn intention.
The businesses that ask us about timing most are the ones posting least. When the calendar is empty, the hour feels like the lever. Once a week of posts is going out, timing becomes what it is: a small, real, automatable improvement on top of consistency. Our customers report spending about fifteen minutes a week reviewing and scheduling posts, and none of that time goes on deciding the hour.
If the problem is the hour, the feature fixes it. If the problem is that there are no posts to schedule on LinkedIn, Magic Marketer® makes those too: one source becomes a set of posts in your voice, and each one goes out at the best time for your account. Free to start, no card.
Same honest answer, different shape. The hub covers what the charts get wrong; each platform page covers what drives timing there.
When your own network is at work, which for most business audiences is the working day in their time zone, and your post history will show the hours that did best. Posts published on Mondays around midday (11am to 2pm, Adelaide time) got the most engagement for accounts posting through Magic Marketer®, measured against each account's usual.
One source becomes a week of finished posts, checked against your guardrails, published when you say so. Start free — no card.
Takes minutes to get set up. No card needed.